When is a motion for a directed verdict typically appropriate?

Unlock all questions

This demo includes only 20 questions. Upgrade to access hundreds of questions, flashcards, exam simulations, and disable ads.

Full question bankExam simulationsFlashcards
From $24.99Unlock all

Study for the Court Functions Test with comprehensive questions, each featuring hints and explanations. Prepare for your exam with ease and confidence!

Multiple Choice

When is a motion for a directed verdict typically appropriate?

Explanation:
A motion for a directed verdict is appropriate when, after the opposing party has presented its case, the record shows there is no legally sufficient basis for a jury to find in that party’s favor. In other words, once the other side has put on its evidence, the judge determines whether any reasonable jury could return a verdict for them. If the evidence is legally insufficient, the judge can direct a verdict for the other side without sending the case to the jury. You can’t move for this before any evidence has been presented, and it’s generally done during the trial, not as a post-trial motion (that would be a later judgment like a JNOV or a new trial).

A motion for a directed verdict is appropriate when, after the opposing party has presented its case, the record shows there is no legally sufficient basis for a jury to find in that party’s favor. In other words, once the other side has put on its evidence, the judge determines whether any reasonable jury could return a verdict for them. If the evidence is legally insufficient, the judge can direct a verdict for the other side without sending the case to the jury. You can’t move for this before any evidence has been presented, and it’s generally done during the trial, not as a post-trial motion (that would be a later judgment like a JNOV or a new trial).

More Multiple Choice Questions
Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy