Which action seeks relief from a judgment on grounds such as excusable neglect or newly discovered evidence?

• A. A motion to suppress evidence.
• B. A motion for relief from judgment.
• C. A motion for change of venue.
• D. A motion for summary judgment.

Answer: (B)

Relief from a judgment is a post-judgment remedy designed to undo or modify a final decision when specific problems affected the fairness of the proceeding. The grounds listed—excusable neglect and newly discovered evidence—are classic reasons a court will revisit a judgment under this mechanism. This option is governed by Rule 60(b), which also covers related situations like fraud, void judgments, or other justifications for relief. The key idea is that after a judgment has been entered, there’s a path to reopen or modify it if something important was missed or misled, rather than going back to court for fresh merits arguments.

Why this is the best fit here: the scenario explicitly asks for seeking relief from a judgment for reasons such as excusable neglect or newly discovered evidence. That points to a post-judgment motion to set aside or amend the judgment, not to evidentiary motions during trial, a venue change, or a merits-based ruling. Suppressing evidence applies to what is or isn’t admissible in court, changing venue deals with where the case is heard, and a summary judgment resolves the case on the merits without a trial. The relief-from-judgment option is the mechanism that specifically targets undoing or revisiting a judgment based on those late-discovered or excusable circumstances.